Archive for July, 2009

I’ve been scammed in the street but I’ve got her photo

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

Had a lovely time today, our four year old son Angus stayed with a friend and we got to lie in for once – we picked him up for lunch time (daddy! I don’t want to go!) and dragged him off to Camden Square for a quick picnic where he and his chum raced on scooters and played hide and seek.

Falling out of the picnic bag are leaflets given to us by a friend yesterday, they’re promoting National Art Hate Week 2009 at the Tate Modern – there’s a fantastic line on the back, “If a child offers you a painting during National Art Week you are to turn away in disgust.” Mind bogglingly wrongheaded, but I recognise the name of one of the artists, Billy Childish. My friend Dave once told me he’s one of the Stuckists, basically the spotty unloved friends of Damien Hurst & Tracy Emin, the ones who didn’t make loads of cash from the patronage of Charles Saatchi. They’re all extremely bitter that they’re poor.

“Oh they’re the Luke Haines of Art then?”, my wife says referring to Haines’ completely brilliant biography, “Bad Vibes: Britpop and My Part in Its Downfall.” “Exactly”, I say, “He did something similar himself once, in 2001 there was his National Pop Strike.”

My wife wants to work this afternoon, so I decide to take the elder son off to The National History Museum. I claim, “He does alright for parties and running about parks but surely he needs stuff to fill his imagination?” The truth is more that I fancy looking at some dinosaur bones.

Son is a bit weirded out by the museum. Everything in it is dead. “Why are they all dead daddy?” And most guilt making of all, “Why isn’t the panda moving daddy? Is he dead?” On seeing a baby seal he’s almost in tears, “We miss him so much.” The whole place is like a dead zoo of taxidermy.

This being less than a complete success we go into the nice bit with – thankfully alive – butterflies and learn how to tell the difference between moths and butterflies. Generally speaking, when moths land on a leaf they’ll sit with their wings spread whilst butterflies will put their wings up. Fantastic fact and if you’re reading this blog post waiting for me to stop rambling and get onto the bit where I get mugged then, sod it, enough scene setting I’ll get on with it.

6 o clock, me and my son are about 2 minutes from the house in Kentish Town and a woman calls out from a car.

“I wouldn’t normally ask a stranger but my car is nearly on empty and I need £3 to get enough petrol to get home.”

Is she a scam? I weigh her up – she’s not asking for much money and she’s also attractive and is displaying a lot of skin. I figure sod it, give her the money, if she’s a crim then I’ve got a story I can blog and if she’s not, well I’ve got a story that not everyone is a bullshit con artist.

I look in my wallet, I’ve only got £10 so I give her that. I say, “This can be an experiment in giving money to strangers. But can I take your photo?”

She doesn’t flinch. I say “smile”. I can’t stop myself grinning foolishly, I’m so going to blog this if she doesn’t turn up.

IMG_0410_small.jpgclicky for biggy

“Is coming round at 8:30 ok?” she asks and takes my business card which I’ve hastily scribbled my address on.

“Absolutely. I trust I’ll see you there.”

I get home and the first thing I do is tell my wife. “What do you think – does this photo look like a criminal?”

“She just looks normal”, my wife replies, “She’s sunburnt and yes, wearing that dress would be the best way to a pull a scam like this.”

“Worth £10 though”, I say, “Just to find out. She doesn’t look like someone who needs to be criminal to survive. I mean, she’d get a job in PR.”

“She could just be lazy”, my wife suggests, “Do this five times and you’ve got enough money to get pissed up or buy some coke. Maybe she’s been made redundant in the recession.”

I post on twitter and almost universally people think it’s a scam. There’s absolutely no way she’s turning up for 8:30

twitter.gif

8:30 comes and I’m feeling nervous and excited. Part of me wants her to turn up to prove the twitterers wrong and part of me wants her not to turn up as this story will work so much better with the photo.

By 9 there’s no sign of her and I start writing this post and tell people I’ll post the photo if I hear nothing by 9:30. It’s now 9:39 and yes, I’ve been scammed.

I’m £10 down and I’m reminded that comedian Richard Herring recently blogged he was mugged for a £500 iphone whilst wearing a Hitler moustache and spent an alarming afternoon in the back of a police car looking for a black man whilst worrying that the police thought he was a right-wing nut case. He finished his post asking newspapers to buy his story for £10 more than he lost so that over-all he was in profit from theft.

I want to do the same thing, but at a lower scale because I’m only an internet micro celebrity and not a famous comedian. Therefore I want to raise £20 via PayPal. Give me your cash. My PayPal address is [deleted]. I promise not to spend the money on petrol, I can’t even drive.

* * *

Update: Thanks to @pretprieel for £5. You are a beautiful man and if I had breasts I’d let you take a photo of them. However – I’m still £15 off my total I require to make a profit on being scammed, so anyone for any more please? All donations, however small, gratefully received.

Update2: Thanks to Ben Gott who lives in Connecticut and writes, “Just read your post, linked from a friend on Facebook, and figured I’d throw you £5, too. This sort of stuff happens here all the time—especially at rest stops along the highway.” Huzzah! That makes me at 50% of my total. The internet WILL win this battle. (It’s really making me giggle, using this scam to basically panhandle. I’ll stop if I reach £20, I promise.)

Update 3: Ha ha – Alasdair MacLeod has given me £1.56. C’mon on internet. We can do it!

Update 4: Ah fuck it. I’m bored of asking for cash, it feels dirty. I’ve raised £11.56 which is probably slightly less than the £10 I lost once the PayPal fees are factored in. Anyway, I’ll use the money to pay for ingredients for a Spag Bog which I mentioned in a previous post and you lot were demanding my recipe.

Update 5: £1.57 from Cr3. Thanks Paul. But please stop sending me money, I’ve stopped begging now. TOTAL: £13.13

I’m Pissing On Your Car

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

Recently did a video for a charity and amongst the footage we shot (we meaning and my wife) there was me pretending to pee on a neighbours car. Simple enough to do – just a water bottle and holding the camera at the right angle.

Today I’m meant to be working on something else, but procrastination is a dreadful thing and I found myself making a donk about weeing on cars. Sorry, it won’t happen again.

EDIT: Ooh, there’s been requests for MP3s. Firstly someone wants it as a ringtone, and secondly someone else asked for an acapella for remixing. How exciting.

UPDATE: Spam Master Dave writes, “I made a remix. I hope you enjoy listening to it as much as i enjoyed producing it”. And here it is.

The Lesson of Charles Babbage

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

I always like checking out the Science Museum and today’s visit comes about because I’ve got a lunch meeting in Victoria and after dropping my son at school I reckon there’s no point going home and fiddling with email for an hour. So I’m there at 10, virtually the first to enter the museum, along with all the children on school trips.

Entry is free but there’s a sign suggesting an donation of £3, €3 or $3 which means at the current exchange rates it’s cheapest to be American (£1.80) whilst Europeans donate about £2.50. I pretend to be Scottish and throw in a quid. Ha.

I’m drawn to the computer section where hulking great lumps of old technology sit behind rope. I think it’s the act of putting this stuff in a museum and saying it has value is what I love. I’d quite happily have a proper national museum of computers that took us from an abacus to the world’s most powerful current computer, the IBM Roadrunner. It would be quite a hit with the ladies.

In front of me is a recreation of Charles Babbage’s Difference Engine and some parts of his slightly less famously named Analytical Engine, the unfinished computer he started in 1837. If he’d have finished the construction, this general purpose mechanical computer would have been “Turing complete” i.e. capable of performing any calculation it’s possible to devise. Basically the same as a modern PC but millions of times slower. Possibly very similar to Windows Vista.

However, work was never completed, the project died with him and the world would have to wait until the 1940s, nearly 100 years later, until we hear the famous names of Colossus, ENIAC and the Manchester Mark 1. BTW: The Germans actually got there first in 1941 with the Zeus Z3, but what with World War II and Hitler, nobody likes to shout about it much. Except me, that is.

There’s no doubt Babbage had an extraordinary brain – half of it is in a jar on display – but he had a fatal flaw, summed up by the statement on a plaque by the exhibit which says that his projects weren’t completed for “funding problems and personality issues.”

288091449_928248ac77.jpg

Personality issues? So Babbage had had the insight to create the world’s first programmable computer and couldn’t get it made because he was a bit of a shit and nobody could work with him? Fantastic.

Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers points out that that one crucial element in success isn’t just being dreadfully clever but having the support of a loving family from day one. “It doesn’t start with talent, it starts with love”, as the promotional posters say. He mentions Oppenheimer, best known as “The Father of the Atomic Bomb”, who whilst a Cambridge undergraduate, attempted to poison Professor Patrick Blackett, a lecturer he took a dislike to. Criminal proceedings were avoided by the intervention of Oppenheimer’s father who persuaded the university that some psychiatric sessions would be more than enough.

Sadly Babbage’s Father was never going to solve his son’s problems – he died in 1927 along Babbage’s wife and son, triggering a mental breakdown which delayed the construction of his machines. And I wonder if he’d had better luck with his home life, he might have been nicer to his contractors and we’d have had the computer built 100 years earlier?

Suddenly consumed with the desire to learn more about Babbage – I visit the instore bookshop – hopeful they can supply me with a nice pop science biography, but all they’ve got is an extremely academic reprinting of some personal papers. So, baring in mind that my head has been filled with a warning from beyond the grave: nurture your kids or else they might accidentally invent the future but be too socially fucked up to communicate it to their peers, I buy an educational toy for my 4 year old son: A robot kangaroo.

I figure we can built it together and it’ll engender a life-long love of engineering and he’ll go on to discover the cure to space-AIDS or something.

* * *

I get home. We build the robot kangaroo. There’s nine steps, my son is bored by step three and leaves me to watch Waybuloo on iPlayer. I listen to David Bowie’s Low. My wife asks, “what’s this amazing prog rock?”

The next morning our son finds the kangaroo and thinks it’s so great that he sticks it on my head, and the battery operated legs wind up my hair and pull it out until I start shouting in pain. My wife tries to help and pull it out and OUCH! OUCH! OUCH!

The kangaroo is banished to a top-shelf.